Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 01:59
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Kennedy’s HHS sent Congress ‘junk science’ to defend vaccine changes, experts say - CNN
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What’s next?
Microsoft Starts Deleting Your Passwords In 6 Weeks—Act Now - Forbes
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Why do wives cheat on their loyal husbands?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Is LGBTQ destroying the world?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Why do I sweat so much after shower?
Thank you.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Saepe maiores nam debitis sequi corporis quasi quasi dolores.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Nintendo Switch 2 owners urged not to skip crucial step setting up their new consoles - GAMINGbible